We call that
person who has lost his father, an orphan; and a widower that man who has lost
his wife. But that man who has known the immense unhappiness of losing a
friend, by what name do we call him? Here every language is silent and holds
its peace in impotence.
--Joseph Roux
The ways
I’ve heard people describe Matt Arch - social butterfly, life of the party, unabashed
activist – comprised a spirit so lively that I met the news of his death with
incredulous devastation. There were times, being around Matt, when the world
appeared to be lovely solely because Matt so thoroughly enjoyed loveliness, so
how could one understand a world without Matt there to appreciate it? My
disbelief left me unsure of what to do with myself, and when I saw my sister
after the awful information had been confirmed, I told her about my emotional
paralysis.
“I want
to do something Matt would have done - like donate to a charity or sign up for
a race. I know that would be the best tribute to his memory, but right now…” I
broke off, unsure of how to finish.
Jess
sighed sadly. “Yeah, I feel the same way, too. I thought for a minute about
signing up for the marathon and running in Matt’s memory…”
I
raised my eyebrows.
Jess
looked solemnly thoughtful, “But I think Matt would understand.”
He
would have, and that’s what I have come to accept about my trajectory of grief
thus far: Matt understood we all bring what we can to a situation, he
celebrated diversity and worked to safeguard our rights to be different. The
people Matt valued come from all different walks of life and no matter who you
were, he was always able to make you feel like the most special person in the
room. He most memorably did that for me when he asked me to write and edit for
his website, which worked to promote his own business prowess and bring
individuals together.
I pitched
my idea of a series connecting popular culture to the workplace to Matt with a
certain amount of trepidation. Not only was I concerned the project would seem
too pedestrian, I was also feeling doubtful, which was my natural response to
another person investing in my intellect.
However
Matt’s eyes lit up. Throughout our collaboration, he was endlessly generous and
enthusiastic. The point of his website was to help people network their way to
success, and he was insistent I set the blog up in a way to best promote myself
(He was characteristically upfront about his view of networking, “Girl, if you succeed,
I at least know someone at the top. We gotta get more gays up there.” “I’m
bisexual,” I corrected. “Baby, even better.”).
I would
meet with or email him to talk about pop culture trends I noticed, and we’d
have conversations about our responses to the fads. I wonder, then, how Matt
would feel about hundreds of his friends finding out about his death on
Facebook. The ghosts of conversations I never had with him haunt my thoughts,
and I imagine, had all of this been happening another way, I’d have approached
him about the concept of grieving on social media.
“Angelcakes,”
He would have doubtlessly utilized his favorite nickname at some point in this
exchange, “This is brilliant, we have to blog about it.”
“But Matt,”
I would have replied; I keep thinking as I write this, “there’s no way to make
this funny.”
I
haven’t yet been able to force my grief to manifest as fundraising, because the
script I seem to be following is too absurdly predictable. I had passed through
denial when quickly scrolling through Facebook after a cautionary phone call
from my sister and searching through hundreds of posts until I was satisfied
the news must contain some truth. And even after accepting the reality of his
death, I still kept stumbling into the word suicide,
an abyss instead of an erect obstacle. (Matt would have been thrilled to see
the word “erect” in his elegiac blog entry.) I marched through anger, snapping
at my partner and indulging in stony silence. In drunken nights, in emotional
hypothesizing, I bargained, I ruminated and re-planned: If only…if only…if only. But
I have not reached a level of acceptance that has yet allowed me to participate
in an activity to honor Matt, because his death is still a ridiculous
impossibility.
My
script is not only normative but also reductive. I’m incredulous because Matt
was so happy and his cheerful spirit infective. Hundreds upon hundreds of people
have expressed their despair at his passing: how could someone so loved ever
feel alone? He was one of the most accomplished people I
knew, and we had many editorial conversations about the best way to prune his
resume in order to organize his many accolades. He was too young, too happy, too important. He loved life too much to die.
He
loved Beyoncé too
much to die, I imagine Matt would have wanted me to add.
But I
know better. Not only have I watched an UpWorthy
video or two in my day, but I’ve also coped with similar demons and can
recognize the hue of this act thanks to the tar marring my own experiences. Nonetheless,
I can’t let go of my incredulity because this shouldn’t have happened, and
don’t we always want to rest in the safety of a logical universal order?
In
Matt’s mind, the logical order of the universe was that we all come together
and celebrate one another. I know few people with Matt’s capacity for love – he
clearly served as the connectarian he aspired to be (buying rights to that connectarian
domain name, of course, because, for Matt Arch, ideology need not be divorced
from business opportunities). I don’t have answers exempt from anyone else
struggling with this tragedy, but I do know a lesson I learned from Matt’s life
and death is that connection matters. Matt would be thrilled if we took the
risk of reaching out to one another at least once each day, practicing the kind
of life he strove to live. If you knew Matt, then you knew what it was to be
included, to be valued. What better tribute to pay to this man than to pass on
that favor, and to try to live in such a way that the gift is ever passed
forward?
I don’t
always know, Matt, the best way to say my goodbyes. But, because I love you,
here’s one last collaboration.